|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
40
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 10:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why? If players aren't interested in PvP, it's because those that inhabit low-sec have turned into reavers. They suicide-gank anything just for the killmail and kill everything in gate-camps just for sport. I can see the appeal... |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.19 15:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nikk Narrel wrote:The so-called carebears don't hate PvP. They just avoid ship to ship combat because it represents too high of a risk profile.
Exactly. And local is essentially like broadcasting "shoot me" when you enter a system. Eliminate that (for starters), and you open up some interesting possibilities. |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
49
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 04:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tampopo Field wrote:Or are you just another selfish pvper who's main motivation behind making such suggestions is getting more easy targets to pad your precious killboard?
Pretty much nailed it... |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
49
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 13:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Xionyxa wrote:What all this really proves, PvP gankers are the real carebears of this game, always complaining about a lack of targets and how scary it is being in a hostile system because people can see that they are there. PvE players don't like being ganked, they don't find being ganked rewarding, however they do learn from it, they learn that most gankers are tards who have no clue what they are doing and they learn how not to loose ships to them, thus making the gankers complain more.
Nailed it! Is it that are fewer PvP players, or perhaps most have evolved past the point of being easily ganked or gate-camped? I think the latter. So basically PvP'ers are looking for new game mechanics to give them easier marks...
Balthazar Lestrane wrote:How about we stop trying to force pilots to play a certain way? I'm all for more PvP but this is a sandbox and everyone has a right to enjoy their playstyle, their way.
But then what would the PvP carebears have to whine about? |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 17:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nikk Narrel wrote:Not seen as fun, and too expensive to consider. Then hating it when you inevitably lose this stake, since noone wins every time.
And with gate-camps, realistically - what are the average person's chances? Pretty low... |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
50
|
Posted - 2013.07.22 04:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
It's not about losing - it's about having the deck stacked before you've even jumped through a gate. If you're not outright killed in a gate-camp, any kind of equal fight quickly turns into a wholesale slaughter as everyone on the opposing player's corps piles on for the killmail. Off-grid boosting is used to great effect, and in the event one manages to gain an upper hand - the attackers simply dock or quickly retreat to a POS.
PvP'ers aren't looking for fights - they're looking for ambushes. Preferably those which provide them with lots of shiny targets and zero opposition. In other words: Fantasyland. |
Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
62
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 04:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:THERE EXISTS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF EVE PLAYERS WHO ARE NOT INTERESTED IN PVP.
What? ;)
Seriously, though... if we could insure our ships for full cost (including modules), I wager more players would be willing to venture into low-sec for sh*ts and giggles. |
|
|
|